At the hearing of an application for appointment of a receiver on notice or at the hearing for confirmation of an ex parte appointment, each party appearing may, at the time of the hearing, suggest in writing one or more persons for appointment or substitution as receiver, stating the reasons. A party's suggestion is without prejudice to its objection to the appointment or confirmation of a receiver.
When a court holds a hearing about appointing a receiver (a neutral person who manages property or a business during a lawsuit), each side can suggest who that person should be. You submit your suggestion in writing at the hearing and explain why your suggested person would be a good choice.
Suggesting someone does not mean you agree that a receiver should be appointed at all. You can still argue against having a receiver while also offering a name in case the judge decides to appoint one anyway.
Summary generated March 14, 2026
No committee notes available for this rule.
Rule 3.1177 renumbered effective January 1, 2007; adopted as rule 353 effective January 1, 1984; previously amended and renumbered as rule 1902 effective January 1, 2002.
Disclaimer
The information on this site is for general reference only and is not legal advice.
Rule text may not reflect the most recent amendments. Always verify against official
sources before relying on any rule in a legal matter.
By using this site, you agree to our
Terms of Service and Privacy Policy,
whether or not you click this button.