These rules should be construed so as to administer every proceeding fairly, eliminate unjustifiable expense and delay, and promote the development of evidence law, to the end of ascertaining the truth and securing a just determination.
The rules of evidence exist to make court cases fair and efficient. Judges use these rules to help find the truth and reach decisions that are just for everyone involved.
When a judge has to interpret or apply these rules, the goal is to keep cases moving without unnecessary costs or delays. The rules are also meant to grow and improve over time as courts handle new situations.
Summary generated March 09, 2026
Notes of Advisory Committee on Proposed Rules
For similar provisions see Rule 2 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, Rule 1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, California Evidence Code § 2, and New Jersey Evidence Rule 5.
Committee Notes on Rules—2011 Amendment
The language of Rule 102 has been amended as part of the restyling of the Evidence Rules to make them more easily understood and to make style and terminology consistent throughout the rules. These changes are intended to be stylistic only. There is no intent to change any result in any ruling on evidence admissibility.
The information on this site is for general reference only and is not legal advice.
Rule text may not reflect the most recent amendments. Always verify against official
sources before relying on any rule in a legal matter.
By using this site, you agree to our
Terms of Service and Privacy Policy,
whether or not you click this button.