Circuit Rule 27-13: Sealed Documents
Circuit Rules and General Orders of the Ninth Circuit — Title VII. General Provisions
(a) Introduction
This Court has a strong presumption in favor of public access to documents. Therefore, except as provided in (d) below, the presumption is that every document filed in or by this Court (whether or not the document was sealed in the district court) is in the public record unless this Court orders it to be sealed.
Accordingly, unless a case or document falls within the scope of (d) below, this Court will permit it to be filed under seal only if justified by a motion to seal the document from public view. See (e), (f), (g), and (h) below. The Court will not seal a case or a document based solely on the stipulation of the parties.
When an entire case was sealed in district court, the case will be docketed provisionally under seal in this Court, and within 21 days of filing the notice of appeal, a party must file a motion to continue the seal or the seal may be lifted without notice. See (g) below. When a document was sealed in the district court, the document will be filed provisionally under seal, and must be accompanied by a notice under subsection (d), a motion to seal under subsection (e), or a notice under subsection (f). The document will remain provisionally sealed until the Court rules on any motion to seal.
Documents in Social Security and Immigration cases, including administrative records, are not filed under seal in this Court. However, remote electronic access to documents is limited by rule to the parties to the case, though the documents will be available for public viewing in the Clerk’s Office. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2(c); Fed. R. App. P. 25(a)(5). This same rule, however, presumes that the orders and dispositions will be publicly available.
(b) Definitions
(1) Sealed Document: Access to a document sealed by the Court is restricted to the Court once submitted. The filer must serve the motion or notice and the sealed document on all parties separately in accordance with Circuit Rule 27-13(c). There is no public access via PACER, even for the parties and counsel of record.
(2) Ex Parte Document: Access to a document filed ex parte is restricted to the Court once submitted. The filer must serve the motion on all parties separately pursuant to Circuit Rule 27-13(c), but is not required to serve the ex parte document on other parties. There is no public access via PACER, even for parties and counsel of record.
(3) Sealed Case: Access to the docket and all documents filed in a fully sealed case is restricted to case participants and the Court. There is no public access via PACER except for parties and counsel of record. (Rev 12/1/25)
(c) Form of Documents
All documents shall be submitted electronically unless the filer is exempt from the electronic filing requirement. Each document or volume of documents submitted under seal shall include the words “UNDER SEAL” on its cover and/or first page. Any publicly filed redacted version of a sealed document shall include the word “REDACTED” on the cover and/or first page of the document.
Because documents submitted under seal will not be viewable to the parties via the Appellate Electronic Filing System noticing, any notice or motion submitted under seal and any document associated with such notice or motion shall be served on opposing counsel in paper form or, with consent, via email. See Circuit Rule 25-5(f)(2).
Rather than moving to file the entire excerpts of record under seal, a party shall submit any document(s) it wishes to seal as a separate volume. See Circuit Rule 30-1.4(d).
(d) Presentence Reports, Grand Jury Transcripts, and Sealed Filings Mandated by Statute or Procedural Rule When a statute or procedural rule requires that a brief or other document be filed under seal (see, e.g., 18 U.S.C. § 5038(c), 3509(d); Fed. R. Crim. P. 6(e)), or when a party is filing an original, revised, or amended presentence report, its attachments, and any confidential sentencing memoranda, a motion under subsection (e) is not required.
Instead, the document(s) shall be submitted under seal in accordance with subsection (c), and accompanied by a notice of filing under seal that references this rule and the pertinent statute or procedural rule. Except for presentence reports and related filings submitted with those reports as described below, any notice of sealing based on a statute or procedural rule must be accompanied by a copy of the referenced statute or procedural rule. (Rev. 12/1/25)
In cases in which any presentence report is referenced in the brief, the party first filing that brief must file under seal the presentence report, the documents attached to the report, and any sentencing memoranda filed under seal in the district court. The report and documents shall be filed on the same day as the brief that references the report and documents, using the presentence report electronic document filing type, without an accompanying notice of filing under seal. These documents shall not be included in the excerpts of record. The party submitting the presentence report and related sealed memoranda shall separately notify the opposing party by email (or first class mail if the opposing party is exempt from electronic filing) of the specific documents submitted, and shall provide a copy upon request.
(e) Motion to Submit a Sealed Document
In the absence of a statutory or procedural requirement as described in (d) above, a party who wishes to submit any document or portion of a document, including a brief, under seal, whether or not it was sealed in the district court, shall file a motion simultaneously with the document. The motion shall explain the specific reasons for this relief and describe the potential for irreparable injury in the absence of such relief. In addition, the motion shall request the least restrictive scope of sealing and be limited in scope to only the specific documents or portion of documents that merit sealing, for example, propose redaction of a single paragraph or limit the request to a portion of a contract. The motion and document will be provisionally sealed pending a ruling on the motion.
Additionally, rather than moving to file the entire excerpts of record under seal, a party shall submit any document(s) that fall within this subsection as a separate volume. See subsection (c) above. Where redaction of a document is feasible, the moving party shall highlight in the unredacted document all portions of the document that party is seeking to file under seal.
(f) Notice of Intent to File a Document Publicly that Was the Subject of a Seal Below
If the filing party does not intend to ask that a seal issued by the district court be continued, the party shall file the documents provisionally under seal, along with a notice of intent to file publicly, in order to allow any other party an opportunity to move for appropriate relief within 21 days of the notice. Absent a motion by another party to continue the seal, or a notice pursuant to subsection (d), the provisional seal will be lifted without notice and the documents will be made available to the public.
(g) Motion or Notice to Maintain a Case Under Seal
A party who wants a case that was fully sealed in the district court to remain fully sealed on appeal shall file a motion to continue the seal within 21 days of the filing of the notice of appeal. The motion must explain with specificity why it is necessary for the entire case to be sealed on appeal and why no less restrictive alternatives are available.
When the seal is required by statute or procedural rule, a motion is not required; instead, a party must file a notice that references this rule and the pertinent statute or rule within 21 days of the filing of the notice of appeal. Such notice of sealing must be accompanied by a copy of the referenced statute or procedural rule. (Rev. 12/1/25)
Absent a motion or notice, the seal may be lifted without notice and the case in full will be made available to the public.
(h) Motions to Unseal
Motions to unseal may be made on any grounds permitted by law. The parties in a civil case may stipulate to the public filing in this Court of a document that was filed under seal in the district court.
(i) Argument
Except as otherwise ordered by the Court, the Court will not close oral argument to the public in any type of case, even when the case itself or the briefs or excerpts of record have been filed under seal. A party seeking a closed hearing shall move for such extraordinary relief at least 14 days prior to the scheduled argument date and explain with specificity why such relief is required and whether any less extraordinary alternative is available.
(j) Dispositions
This Court will presumptively file any disposition publicly, even in cases involving sealed materials. Any party who believes the Court’s disposition should be sealed shall file a motion seeking that relief within 28 days of the completion of briefing.
Notes
Circuit Advisory Committee Note to Rule 27-13
The Court has a strong presumption in favor of public access to Court records in both civil and criminal cases. See The Center for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Group, LLC, 809 F.3d 1092, 1096 (9th Cir. 2016); Oliner v. Kontrabecki, 745 F.3d 1024, 1025-26 (9th Cir. 2014); Seattle Times v. U.S. Dist. Court of Western Washington, 845 F.2d 1513, 1516 (9th Cir. 1988). Motions to file documents under seal are therefore discouraged. Moreover, if the contents of documents originally sealed in the district court have subsequently been disclosed publicly, the Court will be disinclined to maintain the seal.
A motion to seal does not ordinarily change the briefing schedule and any order resolving such a motion will include further instructions for the parties as needed. The Court may defer ruling on the motion until the completion of briefing. If the Court denies a motion to file a document under seal, the Court will ordinarily provide the moving party with an opportunity to withdraw that document and will shield the document from public access during that period.
When the filing of classified documents on an ex parte or sealed basis in a given case is necessary in light of national security issues, the Court will adopt procedures specific to that case.