Rule 19
Settlement of a Judgment Enforcing an Agency Order in Part
REVIEW OR ENFORCEMENT OF AN ORDER OF AN ADMINISTRATIVE AGENCY, BOARD, COMMISSION, OR OFFICER
Rule Text
When the court files an opinion directing entry of judgment enforcing the agency’s order in part, the agency must within 14 days file with the clerk and serve on each other party a proposed judgment conforming to the opinion. A party who disagrees with the agency’s proposed judgment must within 10 days file with the clerk and serve the agency with a proposed judgment that the party believes conforms to the opinion. The court will settle the judgment and direct entry without further hearing or argument.
Plain-English Summary (for reference only — not a substitute for the rule text above)
When a court issues an opinion that partly upholds a government agency's order, the agency has 14 days to write up a proposed judgment and share it with all other parties in the case. The proposed judgment must match what the court said in its opinion.
If another party thinks the agency's proposed judgment does not match the court's opinion, that party has 10 days to submit their own version of the judgment. After that, the court will decide on the final judgment on its own, without holding another hearing.
Summary generated March 09, 2026
Committee Notes
Notes of Advisory Committee on Rules—1967
This is section 12 of the uniform rule (see General Note following Rule 15) with changes in phraseology.
Notes of Advisory Committee on Rules—1986 Amendment
The deletion of the words “in whole or” is designed to eliminate delay in the issuance of a judgment when the court of appeals has either enforced completely the order of an agency or denied completely such enforcement. In such a clear-cut situation, it serves no useful purpose to delay the issuance of the judgment until a proposed judgment is submitted by the agency and reviewed by the respondent. This change conforms the Rule to the existing practice in most circuits. Other amendments are technical and no substantive change is intended.
Committee Notes on Rules—1998 Amendment
The language of the rule is amended to make the rule more easily understood. In addition to changes made to improve the understanding, the Advisory Committee has changed language to make style and terminology consistent throughout the appellate rules. These changes are intended to be stylistic only.
Committee Notes on Rules—2009 Amendment
Rule 19 formerly required a party who disagreed with the agency’s proposed judgment to file a proposed judgment “within 7 days.” Under former Rule 26(a), “7 days” always meant at least 9 days and could mean as many as 11 or even 13 days. Under current Rule 26(a), intermediate weekends and holidays are counted. Changing the period from 7 to 10 days offsets the change in computation approach. See the Note to Rule 26.
(As amended Mar. 10, 1986, eff. July 1, 1986; Apr. 24, 1998, eff. Dec. 1, 1998; Mar. 26, 2009, eff. Dec. 1, 2009.)
Disclaimer
The information on this site is for general reference only and is not legal advice.
Rule text may not reflect the most recent amendments. Always verify against official
sources before relying on any rule in a legal matter.
By using this site, you agree to our
Terms of Service and Privacy Policy,
whether or not you click this button.