Rule Text
If the defendant has been convicted of two or more offenses, before judgment on either, the judgment may be that the imprisonment upon any one may commence at the expiration of the imprisonment upon any other of the offenses. Provided, that the sentencing judge shall, at all times, have the discretion to enter a sentence concurrent with any other sentence.
Amendment history: R.L. 1910, § 5957. Amended by Laws 1985, c. 20, § 2, eff. Nov. 1, 1985; Laws 1997, c. 133, § 68, eff. July 1, 1999; Laws 1999, 1st Ex.Sess., c. 5, § 19, eff. July 1, 1999. NOTE: Laws 1998, 1st Ex.Sess., c. 2, § 23 amended the effective date of Laws 1997, c. 133, § 68 from July 1, 1998, to July 1, 1999.
Plain-English Summary (for reference only — not a substitute for the rule text above)
This summary is not the rule. The rule text controls.
If someone is found guilty of two or more crimes at the same time, the judge can decide how the prison sentences will work together. The judge can order the sentences to run one after another, meaning the person finishes serving time for one crime before starting the sentence for the next.
However, the judge always has the final say in this decision. Even if it seems like the sentences should run back to back, the judge can choose instead to let the sentences run at the same time. This means the person could serve both sentences together instead of one after the other.
This rule gives judges flexibility when someone faces multiple convictions. It ensures that the punishment fits the situation, since judges can weigh the details of each case before deciding whether sentences should stack up or run together.