Rule 458 Dismissal In Summary Cases Upon Satisfaction or Agreement

This rule permits an issuing authority to dismiss a summary case when the provisions of paragraph (A) are satisfied.

Paragraphs (A)(1) through (4) set forth those criteria that a defendant must satisfy before the issuing authority has the discretion to dismiss the case under this rule.

The requirement in paragraph (A)(2) that, when the attorney for the Commonwealth is present at the summary proceeding, he or she must consent to the dismissal, is one of the criteria, along with the other enumerated criteria, which gives the issuing authority discretion to dismiss a case under this rule, even when the affiant refuses to consent.

The requirement in paragraph (B) that the issuing authority include in the transcript of the case the fact that he or she dismissed the case is intended to ensure that an adequate record is made of any dismissals under this rule.

For dismissal upon satisfaction or by agreement in summary cases, as defined in Rule 103, that have been appealed to the court of common pleas, see Rule 463.

For dismissal upon satisfaction or agreement in a court case charging a misdemeanor that is pending before an issuing authority, see Rule 546.

For dismissal upon satisfaction or agreement by a judge of the court of common pleas in court cases, see Rule 586.

Rule 88 adopted April 18, 1997, effective July 1, 1997; renumbered Rule 458 and Comment revised March 1, 2000, effective April 1, 2001; Comment revised January 27, 2021, effective June 1, 2021.

Final Report explaining the provisions of new Rule 88 published with the Court’s Order at 27 Pa.B. 2119 (May 3, 1997).

Final Report explaining the March 1, 2000 reorganization and renumbering of the rules published with the Court’s Order at 30 Pa.B. 1478 (March 18, 2000).

Final Report explaining the January 27, 2021 Comment revisions regarding dismissal by agreement of summary cases in the common pleas court published with the Court’s Order at 51 Pa.B. 688 (February 6, 2021).