Home › South Carolina › South Carolina Rules of Professional Conduct › Rule 6.2

Court Rules Network • courtrules.net

S.C. R. Prof. Conduct 6.2

Not legal advice. Verify against official sources before relying on this text in any legal matter.

Rule 6.2 Accepting Appointments

← Previous Rule 6.1: Voluntary Pro Bono Publico Service Next → Rule 6.3: Membership in Legal Services Organization

Rule Text

A lawyer shall not seek to avoid appointment by a tribunal to represent a person except for good cause, such as:

(a) representing the client is likely to result in violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct or other law;

(b) representing the client is likely to result in an unreasonable financial burden on the lawyer; or

(c) the client or the cause is so repugnant to the lawyer as to be likely to impair the client-lawyer relationship or the lawyer's ability to represent the client.

Plain-English Summary (for reference only — not a substitute for the rule text above)

This summary is not the rule. The rule text controls.

When a judge appoints a lawyer to represent someone, the lawyer usually has to take the case. Lawyers can't just turn down an appointment because they don't want it or find it inconvenient. Courts rely on lawyers to step up and represent people who need help, including people who can't afford their own attorney.

There are only a few good reasons a lawyer can say no to an appointment. First, if taking the case would force the lawyer to break ethics rules or other laws, they can decline. Second, if the case would cost the lawyer too much money to handle properly, that counts as a valid reason too. Third, if the lawyer feels so strongly against the client or the case that it would hurt their ability to do a good job, they can ask to be excused.

This rule matters because it protects people who need legal help but can't easily get it on their own. It stops lawyers from picking and choosing only easy or popular cases while leaving harder cases unrepresented. At the same time, it recognizes that lawyers shouldn't be forced into situations where they'd be doing something illegal, going broke, or unable to represent someone fairly because of a serious personal conflict.

Committee Notes

Comment:

[1] A lawyer ordinarily is not obliged to accept a client whose character or cause the lawyer regards as repugnant. The lawyer's freedom to select clients is, however, qualified. All lawyers have a responsibility to assist in providing pro bono publico service. See Rule 6.1. An individual lawyer fulfills this responsibility by accepting a fair share of unpopular matters or indigent or unpopular clients. A lawyer may also be subject to appointment by a court to serve unpopular clients or persons unable to afford legal services.

Appointed Counsel

[2] For good cause a lawyer may seek to decline an appointment to represent a person who cannot afford to retain counsel or whose cause is unpopular. Good cause exists if the lawyer could not handle the matter competently, see Rule 1.1, or if undertaking the representation would result in an improper conflict of interest, for example, when the client or the cause is so repugnant to the lawyer as to be likely to impair the client lawyer relationship or the lawyer's ability to represent the client. A lawyer may also seek to decline an appointment if acceptance would be unreasonably burdensome, for example, when it would impose a financial sacrifice so great as to be unjust.

[3] An appointed lawyer has the same obligations to the client as retained counsel, including the obligations of loyalty and confidentiality, and is subject to the same limitations on the client lawyer relationship, such as the obligation to refrain from assisting the client in violation of the Rules.

← Previous Rule 6.1: Voluntary Pro Bono Publico Service Next → Rule 6.3: Membership in Legal Services Organization