This summary is not the rule. The rule text controls.
Once both sides have filed their initial court papers (like the complaint and answer), either side can ask the judge to decide the case right away based on those papers alone. This is called a motion for judgment on the pleadings. The idea is that sometimes the papers filed show one side should clearly win, so there's no need for a full trial. A party has to make this request early enough that it doesn't hold up the trial schedule.
There's a catch, though. If either side brings in extra evidence or information beyond what's in the original court papers, the judge can't just treat this as a simple "judgment on the pleadings" anymore. Instead, the judge has to switch gears and treat it like a request for summary judgment, which is a different and more involved process under Rule 56. This matters because summary judgment gives both sides more chances to present evidence and arguments before the judge decides.
In practical terms, this rule protects fairness. It stops one side from sneaking in outside evidence and getting a quick win without the other side having a real chance to respond. If new information comes into play, everyone gets the fuller process that Rule 56 requires, including time to gather and present proof.