Rule Text
Notwithstanding Article 26.13(g) or 42A.301(b)(15), in a criminal prosecution arising from family violence, as that term is defined by Section 71.004, Family Code, a court shall not refer or order the victim or the defendant involved to mediation, dispute resolution, arbitration, or other similar procedures.
Amendment history: Text of article effective until April 01, 2027
Added by Acts 1999, 76th Leg., ch. 389, Sec. 1, eff. Aug. 30, 1999.
Amended by:
Acts 2019, 86th Leg., R.S., Ch. 467 (H.B. 4170), Sec. 4.002, eff. September 1, 2019.
Repealed by Acts 2025, 89th Leg., R.S., Ch. 202 (H.B. 1610), Sec. 3.01, eff. April 1, 2027.
Plain-English Summary (for reference only — not a substitute for the rule text above)
This summary is not the rule. The rule text controls.
If a criminal case involves family violence, the court cannot send the victim or the defendant to mediation, arbitration, or any similar process to work things out. This applies no matter what other rules might normally allow for these kinds of alternatives.
The idea behind this rule is to protect victims of family violence. Mediation and similar processes usually work by having both sides sit down and negotiate a solution together. But in family violence cases, there's often a serious power imbalance between the victim and the person accused of hurting them. Forcing them into a room to "work it out" could put the victim in danger or pressure them into an unfair outcome.
So even if a judge might normally have the option to order mediation in other types of cases, this rule takes that option off the table when family violence is involved. The case has to move forward through the regular court process instead.