Rule 403 Excluding Relevant Evidence for Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time, or Other Reasons
Rule Text
The court may exclude relevant evidence if its probative value is substantially outweighed by a danger of one or more of the following:
• unfair prejudice;
• confusing the issues;
• misleading the jury;
• undue delay;
• wasting time; or
• needlessly presenting cumulative evidence.
See Monelle v. People, 63 V.I. 757 (V.I. 2015); Fahie v. People, 62 V.I. 625 (V.I. 2015); Alexander v. People, 60 V.I. 486 (V.I. 2014); Thomas v. People, 60 V.I. 183 (V.I. 2013); Morton v. People, 59 V.I. 660 (V.I. 2013); Fontaine v. People, 59 V.I. 640 (V.I. 2013); Powell v. People, 59 V.I. 444 (V.I. 2013); Tyson v. People, 59 V.I. 391 (V.I. 2013); . Fontaine v. People, 56 V.I. 660 (V.I. 2012); Francis v. People, 56 V.I. 370 (V.I. 2012); Smith v. People, 55 V.I. 957 (V.I. 2011); Phipps v. People, 54 V.I. 543 (V.I. 2011); People v. Todmann, 53 V.I. 431 (V.I. 2010); Nanton v. People, 52 V.I. 466 (V.I. 2009); Mulley v. People, 51 V.I. 404 (V.I. 2009); Phillips v. People, 51 V.I. 258 (V.I. 2009); Corriette v. Morales, 50 V.I. 202 (V.I. 2008).