§ 60-403 Exclusionary rules not to apply to undisputed matter.

When both sides in a court case agree on a fact and there's no real argument about it, the normal rules that block certain evidence don't apply. This means a fact that isn't actually being contested can be proven using any evidence that's relevant, even if that evidence would normally be blocked under stricter evidence rules.

This rule exists to save time and keep trials simple. If nobody is fighting about whether something happened, the court doesn't need to force people to jump through the usual hoops to prove it. Instead, they can use straightforward evidence to establish that fact and move on.

There are still some limits, though. The court can still throw out evidence under K.S.A. 60-445 if a judge decides it would be unfair, confusing, or a waste of time to allow it. Also, if someone has a valid legal privilege, like attorney-client privilege, that protection still applies even if the fact itself isn't disputed.