Rule Text
A. Except as otherwise provided by law, every final judgment shall contain the typewritten or printed name of the judge and be signed by the judge. Any judgment that does not contain the typewritten or printed name of the judge shall not be invalidated for that reason. Judgments may be signed by the judge by use of electronic signature.
B. For the purpose of an appeal as provided in Article 2083, no appeal shall be taken from a final judgment until the judgment has been signed by the judge.
Amendment history: Amended by Acts 1974, No. 87, §1; Acts 1979, No. 618, §1; Acts 1999, No. 1263, §1, eff. Jan. 1, 2000; Acts 2014, No. 144, §1; Acts 2014, No. 606, §1; Acts 2023, No. 272, §1; Acts 2025, No. 250, §3.
Plain-English Summary (for reference only — not a substitute for the rule text above)
This summary is not the rule. The rule text controls.
When a judge makes a final decision in a case, that decision has to be put in writing and signed by the judge before it counts as official. The judge's name should be typed or printed on the judgment, but if it's missing, the judgment is still valid. Judges can also sign judgments electronically, so a physical signature isn't required.
This signing requirement matters most if you want to appeal a case. You cannot file an appeal until the judge has actually signed the final judgment. In other words, the clock on your right to appeal doesn't start, and the appeal process can't move forward, until that signature is on the document. This protects people from missing deadlines or filing appeals too early, before the judgment is truly finalized.