Art. 857 Same; suspensive conditions

If your case involves a contract that depends on certain conditions happening first, you don't need to spell out every detail in your court papers. You can simply state that all the required conditions were met or happened. The law lets you make this claim in a general way, without listing every step or event.

However, if the other side wants to argue that a condition was not met, they can't just make a vague denial. They have to be specific. They need to explain exactly which condition they say was not fulfilled and why. This keeps things fair, since the person claiming the conditions were met doesn't have to prove every detail unless the other side actually challenges it with real specifics.

In short, this rule makes it easier to file a claim without excessive detail, but it also makes sure that if someone disagrees, they have to explain their side clearly instead of just saying "that's not true" without any explanation.