Rule Text
All pending charges made against a judge in a notice of formal proceedings shall come before the Commission for a hearing on the merits at a time as set forth by Rule 27(A), above, and at a place as set by the executive director all in consultation with the Commission.
Amendment history: Approved, effective August 31, 1984; as amended, effective September 29, 1989; July 1, 1999; as amended, effective May 1, 2010; as amended, effective March 1, 2019; as amended, effective December 4, 2023.
Plain-English Summary (for reference only — not a substitute for the rule text above)
This summary is not the rule. The rule text controls.
When a judge is formally charged with misconduct, the case moves forward to a full hearing where the evidence is examined. The timing of this hearing follows a schedule already set out in another rule (Rule 27(A)). This keeps the process moving at a consistent pace once charges are filed.
The location of the hearing is decided by the Commission's executive director, but not alone. The director works together with the Commission members to pick a place. This ensures the hearing location works for everyone involved in the case, including the judge facing charges.