Rule Text
The following are not excluded by the rule against hearsay, regardless of whether the declarant is available as a witness:
Amendment history: The provisions of this Rule 803 amended March 23, 1999, effective immediately, 29 Pa.B. 1712; amended March 10, 2000, effective immediately, 30 Pa.B. 1639; amended May 16, 2001, effective July 1, 2001, 31 Pa.B. 2788; amended November 2, 2001, effective January 1, 2002, 31 Pa.B. 6381; rescinded and replaced January 17, 2013, effective in sixty days, 43 Pa.B. 620; amended October 25, 2018, effective December 1, 2018, 48 Pa.B. 7111; amended November 18, 2021, effective January 1, 2022, 51 Pa.B. 7438. Immediately preceding text appears at serial page (394681).
Plain-English Summary (for reference only — not a substitute for the rule text above)
This summary is not the rule. The rule text controls.
## Rule 803 Summary
Hearsay is when someone repeats in court what another person said outside of court. Normally, courts do not allow this kind of secondhand information as evidence. But Rule 803 lists specific situations where hearsay statements CAN be used in court, even if the person who originally made the statement is available to testify in person.
The reason these exceptions exist is that certain types of statements are considered reliable enough to trust, even without the person being on the witness stand. For example, something a person said right when an event happened, or records kept by a business in the normal course of its work, are generally seen as trustworthy.
This rule matters because it affects what evidence a judge or jury gets to hear. If a statement fits one of the exceptions listed under Rule 803, a lawyer can present it as evidence even though it is technically hearsay.