Skip to main content
v2.69.0 September 9, 2026
  • Maryland is complete — the fourteen remaining Titles of the Maryland Rules, 841 rules, taking Maryland to all 21 Titles and 1,524 rules. Maryland is one of the few states to put its whole body of court rules in a single numbered compilation, so a Maryland rule cites the same way whatever it governs: Rule 1-101 is the map of the entire thing, saying which Title reaches which court — Title 1 all matters in all Maryland courts except the orphans’ courts, Title 2 civil matters in the circuit courts, Title 3 the District Court, and so on. The largest of the new Titles is Title 18, Judges and Judicial Appointees at 132 rules, which carries the Maryland Code of Judicial Conduct — based, Rule 18-100.1 says, in large part on the ABA’s 2007 Model Code — a parallel Code of Conduct for Judicial Appointees, the Judicial Ethics Committee, and the disability and discipline procedure before the Commission on Judicial Disabilities. Title 16, Court Administration (88 rules) includes Rule 16-308, which establishes the Business and Technology Case Management Program — Maryland’s specialized business docket, with its own program judges and ADR track — along with the rules on recording proceedings, cameras in the courtroom, and public access to judicial records. Also new: Title 6, the 97 rules governing practice in the orphans’ courts and before the registers of wills, a probate forum most states do not have; Title 11, Juvenile Causes (85 rules), largely rewritten effective January 1, 2022; Title 15, seventeen distinct proceedings in 77 rules from habeas corpus and contempt through coram nobis and assisted outpatient treatment; Title 10 on guardians and fiduciaries; Title 9 on family law actions; Title 14, whose 22-rule chapter on foreclosure of lien instruments is the Maryland residential foreclosure procedure; Title 12 on property actions; Title 13 on receivers and assignees; Title 17 on alternative dispute resolution; Title 20, the MDEC statewide e-filing rules; and Title 21, the newest Title, on when a proceeding may be held remotely
v2.68.0 September 8, 2026
v2.67.0 September 8, 2026
  • Eight new Northern Mariana Islands rule sets — 111 rules, taking the CNMI from seven sets to fifteen. The Commonwealth publishes its rules as a numbered R-series rather than one compilation, and these are the subject-matter sets a litigant is most likely to need. The Rules for In Forma Pauperis set out an unusually concrete fee-waiver test: Rule 6 requires the Superior Court to grant the waiver where the applicant or a household member receives a means-tested benefit — NAP, SSI, Section 8 housing, LIHEAP, MLSC representation or PSS free school lunch — or where total gross household income is at or below 125% of the U.S. poverty standard for Hawaii, the mainland figure being inapplicable to the islands; benefits from those same programs do not count as income. The Rules for Electronic Filing and Service, effective December 11, 2021, govern e-filing in all CNMI courts and make registration mandatory for attorneys under Rule 4 — including attorneys admitted pro hac vice, attorneys representing themselves, court-approved mediators and evaluators, and self-represented individuals — absent a good-cause exemption; the rules are deliberately platform-agnostic, referring throughout to an “E-system” designated by the Supreme Court. Also new: the Rules of Alternative Dispute Resolution (32 rules, the largest of the eight), the Rules Governing Procedure for Traffic and Other Infractions, whose Rule 9 designates the Superior Court clerks as traffic clerks and limits their authority to payable violations, the Rules of Guardianship Procedure, the Rules of Procedure for Administrative Appeals, the Rules of Electronic Recordation, and the Rules for Continuing Legal Education, under which Rule 3 requires every active attorney to complete 20 hours every two years, prorated by months of active status, with current and former full-time CNMI judges and justices exempt
v2.66.0 September 8, 2026
  • The New Jersey Rules of Professional Conduct now have their own rule set, matching how every other jurisdiction on the site publishes its conduct rules. All 57 — RPC 1.6 through RPC 8.5 — were already on the site, but filed inside the general Rules of Court set because that is where the New Jersey Judiciary files them, as an appendix to Part 1. A reader searching for the “New Jersey Rules of Professional Conduct” found no such set. New Jersey took the ABA Model Rules as its structure and then departed from them in ways that matter: RPC 1.6 makes disclosure of confidential information mandatory where the lawyer reasonably believes it necessary to prevent a client from committing a criminal, illegal or fraudulent act likely to result in death, substantial bodily harm or substantial financial injury — where the Model Rule is permissive. Existing links to the old locations redirect
v2.65.0 September 8, 2026
  • The New Jersey Rules of Evidence join the site with 90 provisions, taking New Jersey to nine rule sets. Adopted September 15, 1992 and effective July 1, 1993, they are numbered on the Federal Rules of Evidence but depart from them in ways that matter. They sit alongside the evidence statutes rather than replacing them: N.J.R.E. 101(c) provides that adopting them does not repeal an existing statute by implication, though a statute expressly superseded under N.J.S.A. 2A:84A-40 by an official note appended to a rule has no further effect. Their reach is unusually wide — Rule 101(a) applies them in all proceedings, civil, criminal, family, municipal or tax, and applies the privileges of Article V “without relaxation” to every branch and agency of government, not only to courts. Article V is the largest article here, codifying privileges New Jersey treats as statutory rather than common law. On expert testimony, Rule 702 carries the Court’s own 2026 Official Court Comment recording that the rule incorporates the reliability standard prescribed in In re Accutane Litigation, 234 N.J. 340 (2018). Coverage reflects amendments effective through July 1, 2024; Rules 103, 1101 and 1102 were never adopted and are shown as such
v2.64.0 September 8, 2026
  • Delaware’s Superior Court Rules of Special Procedure — a single rule, and an unusual one, completing Delaware at 16 rule sets. When the General Assembly rewrote Delaware’s habitual offender statute in 2016 it opened a path for people already serving sentences imposed under the old version to ask for modification, and the Superior Court adopted this rule to govern how those petitions are brought and decided. Special Rule of Procedure 2017-1 sets out the whole sequence: the Office of Defense Services represents the petitioner unless private counsel is retained; nothing may be filed until a judge issues a certificate of eligibility, which counsel must request and support with specific averments about the sentence and time served; the Attorney General responds stating whether the petitioner qualifies; and only then may the petition itself be filed, setting out every ground for modification, a complete accounting of prior convictions, the petitioner’s conduct while incarcerated, and the results of a formal risk assessment. The court may dismiss summarily on the papers. The rule is numbered by year rather than in the Superior Court’s ordinary series and cites as “Del. Super. Ct. Spec. R. 2017-1”; this version took effect February 1, 2020 and applies to every pending or later-filed modification request
v2.63.0 September 8, 2026
v2.62.0 September 8, 2026
  • Nevada’s evidence law joins the site with 309 sections, completing Nevada’s coverage at 17 rule sets. Nevada has no rules of evidence: the Legislature enacted Title 4 of the Nevada Revised Statutes, “Witnesses and Evidence”, in 1971, and it is cited by section — “NRS 48.035”, never “Nev. R. Evid.” The concepts come from early drafts of the Federal Rules but the numbering is entirely Nevada’s, across ten chapters: general provisions, judicial notice and presumptions (ch. 47), admissibility (ch. 48), privileges (ch. 49), witnesses (ch. 50), hearsay (ch. 51), documentary evidence (ch. 52) and affidavits and foreign depositions (ch. 53), with three short chapters on proof of residence, findings of presumed death and tests of biological specimens. Two points of Nevada practice stand out. Expert testimony runs through NRS 50.275, and the Supreme Court of Nevada held in Hallmark v. Eldridge (2008) that it “has not adopted” Daubert, treating the federal decisions as persuasive rather than controlling. Privileges are codified rather than left to the common law, and chapter 49 is the largest here at 76 sections, running from lawyer-client and doctor-patient through the privileges for clergy, journalists and victims of sexual assault. Coverage reflects the 2025 amendments that took effect July 1, 2026
v2.61.0 September 8, 2026
  • The Hawaiʻi Rules of Evidence join the site with 89 rules, completing Hawaiʻi’s coverage at 30 rule sets. These are statute, not court rules: the Legislature enacted them in 1980 as chapter 626 of the Hawaiʻi Revised Statutes and has amended them by session law ever since, most recently the victim-counselor privilege in 2023. They are cited as rules regardless — “HRE Rule 403” — and are numbered on the Federal Rules of Evidence, though the sequence opens with a rule the federal rules have no counterpart to, Rule 100 on title and citation. Rule 102’s own commentary states the limit of the borrowing: except for Articles III and V, these rules take the Federal Rules as their model. Those two articles are where Hawaiʻi genuinely diverges. Article III codifies presumptions in detail the federal rules never attempt, separating those that shift the burden of producing evidence from those that shift the burden of proof and naming sixteen specific presumptions. Article V rejects the federal approach outright: where the federal rule leaves privilege to the common law, HRE 501 recognizes privileges “only as provided” and then enumerates them, including physician-patient, psychologist-client, victim-counselor and trade secrets. Two further provisions have no federal analogue: Rule 409.5 makes expressions of sympathy or condolence inadmissible to prove liability, and Rule 1102 forbids the judge to comment on the evidence. Every rule carries the official commentary published with it
v2.60.0 September 7, 2026
  • American Samoa joins the site with 11 rule sets and 427 rules — completing the roster at 56 of 56 U.S. jurisdictions. The rules are promulgated by the High Court and published by the American Samoa Bar Association. Almost every stateside assumption needs recalibrating: there is no federal district court on the islands, no certiorari path to the U.S. Supreme Court from the High Court, and the justices are appointed by the Secretary of the Interior. The civil rules follow the Federal Rules with a 20-day answer, but Rules 38 and 39 are marked “(Omitted)” — there is no civil jury under the rules as published. Criminal charging is by information rather than indictment, with no grand jury. The Land and Titles Rules are their own world: about 90% of American Samoa’s land is communally owned and controlled by matai, the Federal Rules have no application there, and a matai-title case is decided by the majority of four matai associate judges with the law-trained justice abstaining. Coverage also includes the Rules of Evidence, the Appellate Court Rules with their strict 10-day new-trial and notice sequence, the High Court Rules including the attorney discipline rules, and the Village Court Rules
v2.59.0 September 7, 2026
  • Guam joins the site with 18 rule sets and 1,021 rules, from the Judiciary of Guam and the Compiler of Laws. Guam layers territory-wide rules over unusually detailed Superior Court local rules, and daily practice lives in the local ones — the General Rules, Civil Rules, Criminal Procedure Rules and Miscellaneous Rules, which carry the small claims rules at MR 5.1. There are no territory-wide rules of criminal procedure, and that is not a gap: Guam’s criminal procedure is statutory, so we publish the 31 procedural chapters of Title 8 of the Guam Code Annotated — home to one of the fastest speedy-trial clocks anywhere, 45 days from arraignment for a defendant in custody. Coverage also includes the Guam Rules of Civil Procedure, whose answer runs 20 days rather than the federal 21; the 2006 Rules of Evidence, whose Rule 702 the Supreme Court of Guam tied to Daubert in People v. Kusterbeck; the Rules of Appellate Procedure, where a criminal defendant has 10 days to appeal and the government 30; and the lawyer discipline rules that replaced the old regime in 2021
v2.58.0 September 7, 2026
  • The District of Columbia joins the site with 21 rule sets and 996 rules. D.C. runs an unusually granular branch-by-branch scheme inside a single trial court, so which rules govern depends on which branch the case is in: the Civil and Criminal Divisions, five separate Family Court sets, Probate, Tax, Small Claims and Conciliation and the Landlord and Tenant Branch each have their own. The civil and criminal rules are deliberately mirrored on the Federal Rules under D.C. Code § 11-946, so federal practice instincts largely carry over — though Civil Rule 26(a)(1) initial disclosures are [Omitted], leaving only expert disclosures. There is no D.C. evidence set, and that is not a gap: the District has never adopted evidence rules, and the Court of Appeals adopted the substance of FRE 702 by en banc decision in Motorola, Inc. v. Murray rather than by rule. Both Probate rulesets are published, because an estate opened before August 22, 2022 is still governed by the older one. Also included: the Rules of the D.C. Court of Appeals — the District’s court of last resort, not the federal D.C. Circuit — and the Rules of Professional Conduct, whose Rule 5.4(b) has permitted nonlawyer ownership of a law practice since decades before Arizona or Utah
v2.57.0 September 7, 2026
v2.56.0 September 7, 2026
v2.55.0 September 6, 2026
v2.54.0 September 6, 2026
v2.53.0 September 5, 2026
v2.52.0 September 5, 2026
v2.51.0 September 5, 2026
v2.50.0 September 5, 2026